Skip to main content

Research summary

Research Hub

HMG (Human Menopausal Gonadotropin)

Clinical — 10 studies

Human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG), also called menotropin, is a urine-derived preparation with follicle-stimulating and luteinising hormone activity. Research on it centres on ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction, often in comparison with recombinant FSH.

Updated

Being studied for

  • Ovarian stimulation for IVF and ICSI
  • Ovulation induction trials in PCOS
  • Comparisons with recombinant FSH
  • Luteinising hormone supplementation
  • Oestrus induction in sheep

What the research shows

The ten citations, from 1990 to 2026, concern ovarian stimulation almost entirely. Three are randomised trials, from 1991, 2020 and 2025. Four are other clinical studies in women undergoing intrauterine insemination, IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), one each from 1990 and 2000 and two from 2024. Two are reviews, from 2015 and 2026, comparing HMG with recombinant FSH-based preparations, and one is a 2024 study in sheep.

Comparisons with FSH mostly found similar results. A 1990 study found no significant difference between HMG and FSH cycles in peak oestradiol, medication used, oocytes aspirated, embryos transferred or pregnancies, and a 2024 study in women with poor ovarian reserve found neither highly purified HMG nor recombinant FSH superior. A 2020 assessor-blinded trial in high responders reported outcomes comparable to recombinant FSH, and fewer adverse events, pregnancy loss among them, in the HMG arm. In the other direction, the two reviews reported more oocytes retrieved with recombinant preparations.

Other studies varied what accompanied HMG in a stimulation cycle. A 2025 randomised trial in women with polycystic ovary syndrome found that a higher letrozole dose before HMG did not raise the pregnancy rate, and its authors cautioned that it may increase the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy. A 1991 randomised IVF trial compared menotropin alone with two GnRH-agonist approaches and found no clear difference between the two agonist approaches. A 2024 study reported comparable outcomes after fresh and frozen embryo transfer whether LH activity came from HMG or from low-dose hCG, and a 2000 study reported similar stimulation measures and pregnancy rates for two routes of administration. In sheep, a 2024 study reported that HMG induced fertile oestrus in ewes synchronised with progesterone outside the breeding season.

Every human study here compares HMG with another preparation or varies how it is used, so the results describe relative performance within a stimulation cycle rather than the action of HMG on its own. Populations differ widely, from high responders to women with poor ovarian reserve or polycystic ovary syndrome, which limits how far any one result carries to another group.

Published Research

Evidence profile

Controlled human evidence

10 cited publications · 6 primary trials

Findings below belong to the studies that reported them. They describe the material and conditions those authors used, not this product, and not an outcome to expect.

Supporting evidence

ClinicalPrimary trial

Human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) combined different doses of letrozole for treating anovulatory infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Li J et al. · Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025

The study reportedApplication of 5.0 mg LE followed with HMG does not improve the pregnancy rate compared to 2.5 mg LE in infertile women with PCOS. An increased dose of LE to 5.0 mg may increase the risks of OHSS and multiple pregnancies.

PMID 40193016DOI 10.1007/s10815-025-03455-zView on PubMed
ClinicalPrimary trial

Randomized, assessor-blinded trial comparing highly purified human menotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in high responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Witz CA et al. · Fertility and sterility · 2020

The study reportedIn high responders, HP-hMG provided comparable efficacy to rFSH with fewer adverse events, including pregnancy loss, suggesting its optimized risk/benefit profile in this population.

PMID 32416978DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.029NCT02554279View on PubMed
ClinicalPrimary trial

Subcutaneous human menopausal gonadotropin administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination cycles

Kaplan PF et al. · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2000

The study reportedSubcutaneous human menopausal gonadotropin administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination treatment cycles was generally well tolerated and yielded stimulation parameters and pregnancy rates similar to those associated with the intramuscular route.

PMID 10871458DOI 10.1067/mob.2000.106131View on PubMed
ClinicalPrimary trial

Prospective randomized study of human menotropin versus a follicular and a luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog-human menotropin stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization

Maroulis GB et al. · Fertility and sterility · 1991

The study reportedThese findings suggest that there is no obvious superiority between the two GnRH-a protocols in the dosage schedule used and that the major advantage of GnRH-a over non-GnRH-a protocols is in decreasing the cancellation rate and increasing the number of oocytes and conceptus obtained.

PMID 1903732DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54368-4View on PubMed
ClinicalPrimary trial

Equivalency of human menopausal gonadotropin and follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression

Edelstein MC et al. · Fertility and sterility · 1990

The study reportedThere were no significant differences between hMG and FSH cycles with regard to the day of hCG administration, mean peak estradiol levels, number of ampules of medication used, and number of oocytes aspirated, embryos transferred, or pregnancies.

PMID 2104806DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53224-5View on PubMed
ReviewSystematic review

Comparative Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone:Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone in a 2:1 Ratio versus Highly Purified Human Menopausal Gonadotropin Alone in Ovarian Stimulation for Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatment Using in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dahan MH et al. · Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026

The study reportedThe higher number of oocytes retrieved with r-hFSH:r-hLH is a pertinent finding, owing to the well-established positive association between oocyte number and reproductive outcomes.

PMID 41729769DOI 10.1159/000550420View on PubMed
ReviewSystematic review

Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation

Levi Setti PE et al. · Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2015

The study reportedRecombinant follicle-stimulating hormone treatment resulted in a higher oocytes yield per cycle than human menopausal gonadotropin at similar cost per oocyte.

PMID 25480425DOI 10.1007/s40618-014-0204-4View on PubMed
Additional indexed literature (3)

Published studies summarised here concern the specific investigational or pharmaceutical materials and study conditions described by their authors. Their findings are not performance claims for Cobalt Peptides material. Citations verified against PubMed on 2026-09-29.

The studies summarised here are research reports; nothing on this page is guidance on use in people or animals.

Notice

All information on this page is provided strictly for laboratory research and educational purposes only.