Research Comparison
Adamax vs Semax
Adamax and Semax side by side, each from its own compound record: what it is, how it acts, and the values the record holds.
Semax
Semax is a synthetic seven-residue peptide, Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro, built from a short fragment of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Its first four residues match positions 4 to 7 of ACTH; the Pro-Gly-Pro tail does not occur there in the hormone and is reported to slow breakdown by peptidases. Short ACTH fragments of this kind are described as lacking the steroid-releasing activity of the full hormone. Semax was developed by Russian researchers, and most of its literature comes from Russian groups working in rats and cell cultures. Controlled human studies are few, many are published only in Russian, and independent replication elsewhere is limited.
How Semax acts
No specific receptor for Semax has been identified. Studies in rats have reported higher expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor TrkB in the hippocampus, and other work has examined dopamine and serotonin turnover in the striatum. Transcriptome studies in rat models of cerebral ischaemia describe shifts in the expression of genes tied to immune and vascular processes. Because its core derives from ACTH, an interaction with melanocortin receptors has been proposed, though direct binding evidence is limited. How these separate observations connect has not been worked out.
The records side by side
- Type: Adamax, not recorded; Semax, Synthetic ACTH analog (heptapeptide)
- Length: Adamax, not recorded; Semax, 7 amino acids
- Molecular weight: Adamax, not recorded; Semax, 813.9 g/mol
- Molecular formula: Adamax, not recorded; Semax, C37H51N9O10S
Reading a comparison
A comparison places two records side by side; it does not merge them. Each description above is drawn from that compound's own record, and the two were not necessarily characterised by the same methods, at the same time, or to the same level of detail. Before comparing any attribute, it is worth establishing that both records describe the substance you think they describe — names are not identifiers, and two entries sharing a name can differ in salt form, stereochemistry or the convention used to state a mass. Where a figure carries no method beside it, the comparison is between two reported numbers rather than between two measurements.